Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Alternative Medicine
- Artificial Intelligence
- Atlas Shrugged
- Ayn Rand
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Conscious Evolution
- Cosmic Heaven
- Designer Babies
- Ethical Egoism
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom of Speech
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- High Seas
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Longevity
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Life Extension
- Mars Colonization
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- New Utopia
- Personal Empowerment
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Private Islands
- Resource Based Economy
- Ron Paul
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Teilhard De Charden
- The Singularity
- Tor Browser
- Transhuman News
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Zeitgeist Movement
The Evolutionary Perspective
Tag Archives: daily
Posted: February 19, 2017 at 11:45 am
What has been dubbed the sound of freedom has been a constant reminder of the areas proximity to Camp Lejeune, particularly in the last week.
As part of an extended training exercise aboard Camp Lejeune artillery blasts have been heard into the wee hours of the morning, causing quite a stir even farther and later than normal.
While many residents are used to the blasts and booms that sometimes rattle windows and doors, many will admit that the last weeks activities have been more, well, active than usual.
The excessive military-related noise is scheduled to end Monday, Camp Lejeune-New River Director of Public Affairs Nat Fahy said.
Some residents have contacted to base to share their frustrations, including some asking if such exercises could be moved elsewhere, he said.
Due to recent fiscal constraints and budget cuts, the Marine Corps is emphasizing home station training, which saves the cost of transporting large amounts of Marines, ammunition, and military equipment to remote locations, Fahy said in response to the residents concerns. Additionally, due to the return of many Marines who were deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq for the last 15 years, many more Marines are at Camp Lejeune. This means that there are more Marines conducting more training so that they can stay ready to fight when the nation calls on them.
A Hubert resident since 1987, Dawn Morton said the occasional blast has become something she and her husband have become accustomed to.
There seems to be less down time between the largest booms, and it usually doesnt continue after 11 p.m. she said.
Morton said the extra noise in the later hours kept her awake the other night, something she isnt used to with the noise.
Camp Lejeune issued a noise advisory early last week to warn the community of the quiet hour violations due to the exercise.
Morton said, however, the cracks in the sheet rock, pictures being broken when they are vibrated off the walls and her pets seeming nervous during the explosions are things she expected when she bought her home.
Were not military, but we love this area and respect and cheer for our military neighbors, she said.
Former Marine and Queens Creek resident Tim Carmody said the blasts have woken his 2-year-old up, which is frustrating. One of the worst parts for him? The late night shoots after 12 a.m. when you are awoken at 1-2 a.m. when your day starts at 3:30-4 a.m., he said.
Carmody said his familiarity with artillery from his time in the military hasnt been able to prevent him from being startled a time or two by the current operations.
The family never would have settled in Hubert had they known the disturbance from the base exercises would be so common, he said.
I lived off of Gum Branch in the Half Moon area and dont recall hearing it, Carmody said. The worst there was the flight path, which wasnt too bad.
In the initial noise advisory Camp Lejeune issued cited weather also playing a factor in how readily heard the artillery blasts may be during the exercise.
On occasions, weather conditions can also greatly affect hownoisetravels, Fahy previously told the Daily News. Variations in temperatures at higher atmospheres can create a trap-like effect that bounce sound waves back toward the ground, creating areas of high intensity sound miles away from the sounds source.
The additional artillery noise outside of quiet hours is part of a comprehensive live fire and maneuver exercise supported by 10th Marine Regiment, 2nd Marine Division, Fahy said.
Quiet hours are normally 12:01 – 6 a.m. Monday-Saturday and from 12:01 a.m.-noon on Sundays, Fahy said.
The base releases a noise report every Friday in ongoing effort to keep the community informed.
That report can be found at lejeune.marines.mil/news/noise-advisories.
Posted: at 11:21 am
A former president of the National Union of Students and chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, Trevor Phillips was once a leading member of what might be called the metropolitan liberal elite. He had the ear of everyone who mattered in the Labour party, and on matters of race and equality he was the go-to guy.
But then he began to have doubts about many of the political positions he held and started confronting what he saw as right-on shibboleths. Pretty soon he was being denounced as a turncoat in the same terms that he had once denounced others. In recent years, he has made several documentaries, with attention-grabbing titles such as Things We Wont Say About Race That Are True, that have aimed to challenge received wisdoms. The latest, which sounds like a homage to a Daily Telegraph letters page correspondent, is entitled Has Political Correctness Gone Mad?
I meet Phillips at his production office in Kentish Town, north London. Now 63, with greying hair and a slight stoop, hes no longer the youthfully strutting figure who seemed to be everywhere in the 1990s. But as soon as he gets talking, the eyes light up and the old passion comes pouring out.
Political correctness is one of those terms that mean different things to different people. What does it mean to him? The title is not mine, he says, a little defensively. Its a Channel 4 title. I do not normally ever use the term political correctness, except with a heavy dose of doubt about its usefulness, because basically it has become a stick with which the right beats everyone else.
In fact Phillips has used the term before. Two years ago he wrote in the Daily Mail and Sunday Times of po-faced political correctness that cramps all conventional parties. Still, his thesis in the film is that by trying to corral political debate into a tightly policed acceptability, the political establishment has created the conditions for insurgent figures such as Nigel Farage, Jeremy Corbyn and Donald Trump.
Its a perfectly reasonable argument but the programme is a little too wide-ranging in its targets to make its case. It jumps from the anti-Islamic group Pegida to censorious transgender activists to social media trolls to students banning sombreros. Although worthy subjects for investigation, they dont quite gel as an explanation for the rise of Corbyn, let alone Trump.
But what they do point to is Phillipss increasing frustration with the conviction that if we can only control the expression of ideas, we will all be able to live together in peace and harmony. October 2000 saw the publication of a report commissioned by Phillips, then chair of the Runnymede Trust, called The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain. It marked perhaps the high-water mark of multicultural thinking, and suggested that Britain should become a community of communities in which each community would respect the other by avoiding causing offence.
Well I think it would be fair to say that I made a big mistake, he says now. It was a clear statement that some groups can play by their own rules. That to me runs counter to my own political beliefs. Why I am still a supporter of the Labour party is because I believe fundamentally in solidarity and reciprocity, and I think most on the left have forgotten both of those things.
Four years after that report, Phillips wrote an article in which he compared a critique by David Goodhart of multiculturalism to the jottings from the BNP leaders weblog. Two months later, he suddenly announced the end of multiculturalism and called for a core of Britishness to be asserted. Not long afterwards, Ken Livingstone suggested that Phillips had swung so far to the right that he would soon be joining the BNP.
Goodhart and Phillips are now good friends. I think Trevor has been intellectually and morally brave, says Goodhart. He took a lot of flak for looking past the cliches of the anti-racist left. He is regarded as a curious Uncle Tom figure by a lot of the black and ethnic minority establishment. Trevor still thinks of himself as a somewhat sceptical member of the left family and at times has, I think, felt quite wounded by the attacks.
I ask Phillips if the threat of expulsion from his political tribe does act as a disincentive to speak out about what he really thinks.
Depends how much of your life you want to spend lying to yourself, he says. I think its pretty wearying to get up each day and tell yourself to go advocate for something that you know not to be true. And what is even worse is if youre in public office or politics and everyone youre telling this to also knows it isnt true. Not only are you a liar, youre also an idiot.
If, as Goodhart says, he has been wounded by his ostracising, he doesnt appear to nurture any regrets. I have lost lots and lots of friends. My view is if you cant tolerate that I want to have this discussion, then we cant really be friends. What youre asking me to do is collude in a lie with you rather than argue it out. A big part of it is that on the left, if you look like me, youre supposed to think in a particular way. And they just hate it if a black person isnt the person they want him to be.
He believes that we all have to get used to and get over being offended. I dont care about offending people, he says. And I dont really care about being offended. There are quite a lot of people I actually want to offend. And I want to offend them all the time. But if somebody stands on the other side of the street and shouts nigger at me Im not going to be thrilled, but Im not going to argue for him to get locked up.
Then why was he appalled at what he saw as antisemitic bigotry in the Labour party? Surely by his own reckoning, he shouldnt much care. Oh the problem with that, he says, is not that people were using the word Zion, but that people were making it impossible for Jewish students to have meetings. There is an important distinction between words and actions.
But his complaints were not just about actions, I suggest. Was he not also concerned that the Labour party had played down antisemitic attitudes by some of its members? Yes, he agrees. There are people who believe there is no real distinction between Jews, Zionists and Israelis. And the party doesnt want to get into that at all because, lets be frank, its increasingly dependent on a demographic group Muslims within which a sizable minority subscribes to that view.
Phillips studied chemistry at Imperial College, London, and, he says, its his science training that made him change his mind about how race was discussed in this country. By the turn of the millennium, he says, it was obvious that it made little sense to classify people as black, brown and white. He has little time for designations such as BAME (black, Asian and minority ethnic).
If you look at Indians and Pakistanis, they have completely different life chances. Its the same with Afro-Caribbeans and West Africans. Im not clever enough to have a Damascene conversion. I just look at the numbers and if they clash with how I think the world should be working, Ive got to change the picture.
Fair enough, but his critics will say that Phillips is making straw man arguments. After all, who is stopping him from saying what he wants? Hes got a TV documentary and coverage in national newspapers. Where is this politically correct establishment thats trying to stifle him?
A ruling elite maintains an idea of whats good and reasonable by a whole series of methods, he counters. Who gets advancement, rewards and status? If you dont hold to the orthodoxy, you stop being invited to meetings. Theres a phrase that people in centre-left politics use: oh hes very good. What they actually mean is: I agree with him.
Phillips has grown used to people not agreeing with him. Perhaps a little too used to it. As one old comrade says: He cant resist tweaking the nose of the bien pensant.
But in these disagreeable times, dissenting voices will make themselves heard. The liberal consensus has broken down, and rehashing the old pieties wont put it back together again. Whether or not he receives an invitation, Phillips is determined to have his say.
Has Political Correctness Gone Mad? Channel 4, 9pm, Thursday 23 February
Here is the original post:
Posted: at 11:15 am
Featured Conversations about artificial intelligence must focus on jobs as well as questioning its purpose, values, accountability and governance.
There is an urgent need to expand the AI epistemic community beyond the specific geographies in which it is currently clustered. Credit: YouTube
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer the subject of science fiction and is profoundly transforming our daily lives. While computers have already been mimicking human intelligence for some decades now using logic and if-then kind of rules, massive increases in computational power are now facilitating the creation of deep learning machines i.e. algorithms that permit software to train itselfto recognise patterns and perform tasks, like speech and image recognition, through exposure to vast amounts of data.
These deep learning algorithms are everywhere, shaping our preferences and behaviour. Facebook uses a set of algorithms totailor what news stories an individual user sees and in what order. Bot activity on Twittersuppressed a protest against Mexicos now presidentby overloading the hashtag used to organise the event. The worlds largest hedge fund is building a piece of software to automate the day-to-day management of the firm, including, hiring, firing and other strategic decision-making. Wealth management firms are increasingly using algorithms to decide where to invest money. The practice of traders shouting and using hand signals to buy and sell commodities has become outdated on Wall Street as traders have been replaced by machines. And bots are now being used to analyse legal documents to point out potential risks and areas of improvement.
Much of the discussion on AI in popular media has been through the prism of job displacement. Analysts, however, differ widely on the projected impact a 2016 studyby the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developmentestimates that 9% of jobs will be displaced in the next two years, whereas a 2013 study by Oxford University estimates that job displacement will be 47%. The staggering difference illustrates how much the impact of AI remains speculative.
Responding to the threat of automation on jobs will undoubtedly require revising existing education and skilling paradigms, but at present, we also need to consider more fundamental questions about the purposes, values and accountability of AI machines. Interrogating these first-order concerns will eventually allow for a more systematic and systemic response to the job displacement challenge as well.
First, what purpose do we want to direct AI technologies towards? AI technologies can undoubtedly create tremendous productivity and efficiency gains. AI might also allow us to solve some of the most complex problems of our time. But we need to make political and social choices about the parts of human life in which we want to introduce these technologies, at what cost and to what end.
Technological advancement has resulted in a growth in national incomes and GDP, yet the share of national incomes that have gone to labour has dropped in developing countries. Productivity and efficiency gains are thus not in themselves conclusive indicators on where to deploy AI rather, we need to consider the distribution of these gains. Productivity gains are also not equally beneficial to all incumbents with data and computational power will be able to use AI to gain insight and market advantage.
Moreover, a bot might be able to make more accurate judgments about worker performance and future employability, but we need to have a more precise handle over the problem that is being addressed by such improved accuracy.AI might be able to harness the power of big data to address complex social problems. Arguably, however, our inability to address these problems has not been a result of incomplete data for a number of decades now we have had enough data to make reasonable estimates about the appropriate course of action. It is the lack of political will and social and cultural behavioural patterns that have posed obstacles to action, not the lack of data. The purpose of AI in human life must not be merely assumed as obvious, or subsumed under the banner of innovation, but be seen as involving complex social choices that must be steered through political deliberations.
This then leads to a second question about the governance of AI who should decide where AI is deployed, how should these decisions be made and on what principles and priorities? Technology companies, particularly those that have the capital to make investments in AI capacities, are leading current discussions predominantly. Eric Horvitz, managing director of the Microsoft Research Lab, launched the One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence based out of Stanford University. The Stanford report makes the case for industry self-regulation, arguing that attempts to regulate AI, in general, would be misguided as there is no clear definition of AI and the risks and considerations are very different in different domains.
The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy recently released a report on the Preparing for the Future of Artificial Intelligence, but accorded a minimal role to thegovernment as regulator. Rather, the question of governance is left to the supposed ideal of innovation i.e. AI will fuel innovation, which will fuel economic growth and this will eventually benefit society as well. The trouble with such innovation-fuelled self-regulation is that development of AI will be concentrated in those areas in which there is a market opportunity, not necessarily areas that are the most socially beneficial. Technology companies are not required to consider issues of long-term planning and the sharing of social benefits, nor can they be held politically and socially accountable.
Earlier this year, a set of principles for Beneficial AI was articulated at the Asilomar Conference the star speakers and panelists were predominantly from large technology companies like Google, Facebook and Tesla, alongside a few notable scientists, economists and philosophers. Notably missing from the list of speakerswas the government, journalists and the public and their concerns. The principles make all the right points, clustering around the ideas of beneficial intelligence, alignment with human values and common good, but they rest on fundamentally tenuous value questions about what constitutes human benefit a question that demands much wider and inclusive deliberation, and one that must be led by government for reasons of democratic accountability and representativeness.
What is noteworthy about the White House Report in this regard is the attempt to craft a public deliberative process the report followed five public workshops and an Official Request for Information on AI.
The trouble is not only that most of these conversations about the ethics of AI are being led by the technology companies themselves, but also that governments and citizens in the developing world are yet to start such deliberations they are in some sense the passive recipients of technologies that are being developed in specific geographies but deployed globally. The Stanford report, for example, attempts to define the issues that citizens of a typical North American city will face in computers and robotic systems that mimic human capabilities. Surely these concerns will look very different across much of the globe. The conversation in India has mostly been clustered around issues of jobs and the need for spurring AI-based innovation to accelerate growth and safeguard strategic interests, with almost no public deliberation around broader societal choices.
The concentration of an AI epistemic community in certain geographies and demographics leads to a third key question about how artificially intelligent machines learn and make decisions. As AI becomes involved in high-stakes decision-making, we need to understand the processes by which such decision making takes place. AI consists of a set of complex algorithms built on data sets. These algorithms will tend to reflect the characteristics of the data that they are fed. This then means that inaccurate or incomplete data sets can also result in biased decision making. Such data bias can occur in two ways.
First, if the data set is flawed or inaccurately reflects the reality it is supposed to represent. If for example, a system is trained on photos of people that are predominantly white, it will have a harder time recognising non-white people. This kind of data bias is what led a Google application to tag black people as gorillas or the Nikon camera software to misread Asian people as blinking. Second, if the process being measured through data collection itself reflects long-standing structural inequality. ProPublica found, for example, that software that was being useful to assess the risk of recidivism in criminals was twice as likely to mistakenly flag black defendants as being at higher risk of committing future crimes. It was also twice as likely to incorrectly flag white defendants as low risk.
What these examples suggest is that AI systems can end up reproducing existing social bias and inequities, contributing towards the further systematic marginalisation of certain sections of society. Moreover, these biases can be amplified as they are coded into seemly technical and neutral systems that penetrate across a diversity of daily social practices. It is, of course, an epistemic fallacy to assume that we can ever have complete data on any social or political phenomena or peoples. Yet, there is an urgent need to improve the quality and breadth of our data sets, as well as investigate any structural biases that might exist in these data how we would do this is hard enough to imagine, leave alone implement.
The danger that AI will reflect and even exacerbate existing social inequities leads finally to the question of the agency and accountability of AI systems. Algorithms represent much more than code, as they exercise authority on behalf of organisations across various domains and have real and serious consequences in the analog world. However, the difficult question is whether this authority can be considered a form of agency that can be held accountable and culpable.
Recent studies suggest for example that algorithmic trading between banks was at least partly responsible for the financial crisis of 2008; the crash of the sterling in 2016 has similarly been linked to a panicky bot-spiral. Recently, both Google and Teslas self-driving care caused fatal crashes in the Tesla case, a man died while using Teslas autopilot function. Legal systems across the world are not yet equipped to respond to the issue of culpability in such cases, and the many more that we are yet to imagine. Neither is it clear how AI systems will respond to ethical conundrums like the famous trolley problem, nor the manner in which human-AI interaction on ethical questions will be influenced by cultural differences across societies or time. The question comes down to the legal liability of AI, whether it should be considered a subject or an object.
The trouble with speaking about accountability also stems from the fact that AI is intended to be a learning machine. It is this capacity to learn that marks the newness of the current technological era, and this capacity of learning that makes it possible to even speak of AI agency. Yet, machine learning is not a hard science; rather its outcomes are unpredictable and can only be fully known after the fact. Until Googles app labels a black person as a gorilla, Google may not even know what the machine has learnt this leads to an incompleteness problem for political and legal systems that are charged with the governance of AI.
The question of accountability also comes down to one of visibility. Any inherent bias in the data on which an AI machine is programmed is invisible and incomprehensible to most end users. This inability to review the data reduces the agency and capacity of individuals to resist, even recognise, the discriminatory practices that might result from AI. AI technologies thus exercise a form of invisible but pervasive power, which then also obscures the possible points or avenues for resistance. The challenge is to make this power visible and accessible. Companies responsible for these algorithms keep their formulas secret as proprietary information. However, the far-ranging impact of AI technologies necessitates the need for algorithmic transparency, even if it reduces the competitive advantage of companies developing these systems. A profit motive cannot be blindly prioritisedif it comes at the expense of social justice and accountability.
When we talk about AI, we need to talk about jobs both about the jobs that will be lost and the opportunities that will arise from innovation. But we must also tether these conversations to questions about the purpose, values, accountability and governance of AI. We need to think about the distribution of productivity and efficiency gains and broader questions of social benefit and well being. Given the various ways in which AI systems exercise power in social contexts, that power needs to be made visible to facilitate conversations about accountability. And responses have to be calibrated through public engagement and democratic deliberation the ethics and governance questions around AI cannot be left to market forces alone, albeit in the name of innovation.
Finally, there is a need to move beyond the universalising discourse around technology technologies will be deployed globally and with global impact, but the nature of that impact will be mediated through local political, legal, cultural and economic systems. There is an urgent need to expand the AI epistemic community beyond the specific geographies in which it is currently clustered, and provide resources and opportunities for broader and more diverse public engagement.
Urvashi Aneja is Founding Director of Tandem Research, a multidisciplinary think tank based in Socorro, Goa that produces policy insights around issues of technology, sustainability and governance. She is Associate Professor at the Jindal School of International Affairs and Research Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation.
Categories: Featured, Tech
Tagged as: AI, AI-based innovation, Artificial Intelligence, Beneficial AI, Facebook, GDP, Google, human intelligence, innovation, technology, Tesla, Urvashi Aneja
Go here to see the original:
Posted: at 11:06 am
Franklin D. Roosevelt Jr., visited the University of Virginia law School today (Feb. 19, 1937), discussed the courses offered here and took application blanks away with him, it was announced by Dr. George Boardman Eager, dean of the law school. It has been reported for some time that young Roosevelt was considering entering the University next year but Dr. Eager stated that he had no communication from the Roosevelt family until he was visited this morning.
The Daily Progress account went on: Roosevelt visited the Monticello Hotel this morning but did not register for a room, employees there said.
A day earlier, The Daily Progress acknowledged the rumors swirling about town of the presidents son considering UVa. Roosevelt and his fiance Ethel du Pont had been spotted in town, and seen by passengers on the Florida-New York train.
Roosevelt Jr. did enroll in the School of Law at UVa that fall and went on to earn his Juris Doctorate degree in 1940. It was at his graduation that his father, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, delivered his famous Stab in the Back speech, criticizing Italys entry into the war. Soon after graduation, Roosevelt was commissioned in the U.S. Navy and following WW II, assumed his law career. He also served on President Harry S. Trumans committee on civil rights, and was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives.
Posted: at 11:03 am
highlights five more chefs who are charged with introducing visitors and locals alike to the best culinary offerings in Jamaica.
This weeks featured chefs are from Hedonism II, Negril
Lead cook, Pastafari Italian Restaurant, Hedonism II Resort
At age six, Davey Thomas would study the ingredients as his mother cooked. Then he would try and replicate her cooking to see how his compared. All that practice still did not lead him to a six-burner stove. Actually, he took what he thought was the safe road by becoming an auto mechanic. But the passion for cooking had already taken root and Thomas eventually heeded and enrolled in the Petersfield Vocational Training Centre, where he studied Food Preparation.
I love trying new flavours and taking traditional recipes and adding new stuff. I take pride in my cooking as it reflects on me as an individual; its my pride, he says. Thomas spends a lot of his time surfing the Internet for new ideas and says, No matter what area you are in, you have to have a passion for it, otherwise it makes no sense.
Thomas likes preparing anything with seafood and he continues to hone his skills by cooking at home daily.
Garde manger, Hedonism II Resort
An ice-carving genius, says Executive Chef Anthony Miller of Milton Paltie.
Paltie was 14 the first time his aunt asked him to prepare a meal. Having no idea what to cook he enlisted the help of a friend, who added thyme, escallion and butter to the pot. The final result steam fish got rave reviews. To this day his aunt has no idea that he was not the cook.
Briefly sidetracked by carpentry until that income stream slowed, he found himself at Couples Tower Isle, the result of hearing about a vacancy in the stewards department.
When he arrived with a friend the only jobs available were for cooks. Certain that they would not qualify, they got the jobs nevertheless and started in the pantry. After a few months we was awarded Cook 1 (the highest level team member). Every day I was working from 6:00 am to 8:00 pm for about two years. The financial controller asked why I was working those long hours. I told him its not what I was putting in but what I was getting back, and what I was getting back was a salary and experience, so I felt that I was the one winning.
Paltie realised that he could make this his profession after travelling to North America and seeing the respect accorded chefs.
He took certification courses through Johnson and Wales in Kitchen Management, Sanitation and Garde Manger. His true passion, he decided, was fruit, vegetable and ice carving. Its like a painter with his canvas. For me, my canvas is the ice or the produce.
A recipient of many awards, Paltie has copped: the 2002 JCDC silver medal for ice carving and fish platter
2004 Curry Festival gold medal for fruit, vegetable and ice carving
2008 Wow Festival Master Ice Carver
2015 & 2016 Taste of Jamaica gold medalist for the ice carving
2106 Taste of Jamaica silver medal, lamb platter
I think cooking chose me, he tells Thursday Food.
Harry San Japanese Restaurant, Hedonism II Resort
Twenty-one-year-old Rashane Reid says, Cooking is in my genes; my father is a chef (in Nantucket) and as a child he always had me in the kitchen. My uncles are restaurateurs and bakers, my grandmothers gizzada, grater and toto cakes were amazing and famous.
As a child I was in awe of my fathers knife skills and knew I wanted to follow suit.
My first culinary expression was a fried egg which I overcooked. I was instructed by my mother to repeat the process until I got it right. To this day I am still fascinated by how many ways a simple egg can be prepared and, also, there is nothing about an egg I cant tell you. My mother continues to be my motivator. A few years ago she had a stroke and I made a promise to always make her proud.
My driving philosophy comes from my favourite book You Can Work Your Own miracle by Napoleon Hill. It says: I am who I am, where I am, because of my daily habits.
Hedonism is Reids first full-time job. He started as a trainee and through dedication and hard work now enters competitions like Taste of Jamaica. Hedonism took me from a baby to a man, and the best part of being a chef is seeing peoples faces when they taste your food. There is a bond between the diner and the chef.
Reids favourite meal to cook is chicken back with pumpkin served with cornmeal dumplings.
Pastafaria Italian Restaurant, Hedonism II Resort
Odane Whitelocke remembers, as if it were yesterday, the day in 2005 when he decided he wanted to become a chef. My family members had a restaurant and I had started to work in there. I fell in love with it. That same year he enrolled at HEART Petersfield, where the love affair continued.
In 2009, in a quest to further his culinary skills, he attended George Brown College in Toronto, Canada. For me, cooking is an art and I love art. Its an area where I am very confident in my abilities and not afraid to challenge myself through competitions.
In 2015, Whitelocke placed third in the Taste of Jamaica Chef of the Year and in 2016, he placed first in the beef category with a dish he called authentic beef roulade.
Being from a family in which both parents cooked, food and cooking were always a part of his socialisation.
His favourite dish to cook is chicken and beef pasta in Alfredo sauce.
After 12 years his passion has not waned. Indeed, he is fully aware of just how much more there is to learn.
Oshane Powell, cook
Flame Chop House, Hedonism II Resort
At the age of seven Oshane Powell was cooking curried pork. Not that he intended to. But one day his stepfather, the cook in the family, had an emergency. It was left to Oshane to handle dinner. Thankfully, the pork was a hit and a chef was born.
Powell, who studied Food and Nutrition in school, nevertheless went on to work as an auto mechanic but would continue to cook at home for the family. The neighbours would always ask: Who is cooking? as the aroma wafted through the yard.
Deciding to give cooking his full attention, Powell arrived at Hedonism as a trainee and, through hard work and love of art, started fruit and vegetable carving. Using YouTube and cooking shows to practise and improve he eventually ended up cooking in the main kitchen.
In 2016, Chef Anthony Miller entered Powell in the Taste of Jamaica cooking competition. Powell copped the Junior Chef of the Year title with his chicken breast wrapped with sausage and a sweet potato tower, as well as a seafood chowder.
I love food. I am passionate about food, so I am willing to learn everything! he shares with Thursday Food
Posted: at 10:57 am
One of President Trump’s GOP primary opponents called on members of the new administration, including the president, to “be on the same page” and avoid inconsistent statements that are troubling to foreign allies.
Ohio Gov. John Kasich said Sunday that allies at the Munich Security Conference are still worried about the support for NATO by President Trump himself, despite repeated reassurances at the conference from several top members of the administration, including Vice President Mike Pence, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly and Defense Secretary Jim Mattis.
“What they’re saying is we can hear from the vice president, Gen. Matts, Gen. Kelly, but we’re not sure about the president. It is vital that the administration be on the same page,” Kasich said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
The U.S. involvement in NATO has been a key issue at the Munich Security Conference, with Pence talking about an “unwavering” commitment to the alliance. But the president himself has wavered in his support, at one point saying that the U.S. may not fulfill its promise to defend other allies of those countries don’t increase their monetary support of NATO.
Subscribe today to get intelligence and analysis on defense and national security issues in your Inbox each weekday morning from veteran journalists Jamie McIntyre and Jacqueline Klimas.
Sorry, there was a problem processing your email signup. Please try again later.
Thank you for signing up for the Daily on Defense newsletter. You should receive your first issue soon!
“It’s just critically important that all the signals coming out of the administration are very solid and very consistent that we all stand together in Western alliance,” Kasich said.
The uncertainty brought on by political activism is chipping away at coal mining communities.
02/19/17 12:03 AM
Posted: February 18, 2017 at 4:45 am
Pauline Hanson and Derryn Hinch launched emotional arguments in favour of euthanasia, describing the relief it would have given to their families.
The senators were speaking during a debate on a private members bill that would cut federal interference with laws in the territories on assisted suicide, The Daily Telegraph reported.
She weighed about 30 kilos, and looked like a Biafran refugee, Hinch revealed of his mothers appearance as she suffered from lung cancer 26 years ago. Hinch himself has fought liver cancer.
Hanson, meanwhile, spoke of watching the impact on her father of Parkinsons disease, The Daily Telegraph wrote.
We have more compassion for animals than we do for people, Hanson said,adding that euthanasia opponents had never watched a family member lose the ability to care for themselves.
The private members bill would allow the Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory legislative powers to bring in assisted suicide and repeal the Euthanasia Laws Act 1997 that prevents them from doing so.
The Restoring Territory Rights (Dying with Dignity) Bill 2016was brought by Greens leader Richard Di Natale. Announcing the bill in August, Di Natale said: Dying with dignity is a social justice issue, its a human rights issue, its a public health issue and it should not be pushed to the political margins.
Hinch and Hanson have been vocal in their support for euthanasia for some time.
Hansons One Nation party has a policy advocating euthanasia, that proposes any person of voting age be permitted to have a document written up that appoints two people as executors who could carry out that persons wish for assisted suicide should they be unable to take action themselves.
I and only I, will determine when my time is up and if I am not in a position to do so, then loved ones of my choosing will, Hanson has written of the policy.
Hinch has argued in the past that the right to decide on ones time of death was robbing older Australians of their dignity.
Being deprived of the legal right to decide that their quality of life has deteriorated to such an extent that they want to say goodbye, he has written of the current laws.
Read more from the original source:
Posted: at 4:20 am
How To Choose Your Eevee Evolution In 'Pokmon GO:' Umbreon And Espeon Edition
Of all the Pokmon in the Pokworld, Eevee remains something of a rarity. The evolutionary wildcard has always featured random evolutions, and now that Gen 2 has hit Pokmon GO, the potential forms have increased from three to five. People have long …
Pokemon Go trick: How to make Eevee evolve into Espeon and Umbreon
Guide: Pokemon Go has a new Eevee evolution trick for Umbreon and Espeon
Pokmon Go Eevee evolution: How to evolve Eevee into Umbreon, Espeon, Vaporeon, Jolteon and Flareon with new …
Posted: at 4:20 am
Congo River fish evolution shaped by intense rapids: Genomic study …
New research provides compelling evidence that a group of strange-looking fish living near the mouth of the Congo River are evolving due to the intense …
Posted: at 4:01 am
Adrian Sifuentez writes on a large beach ball Wednesday, Feb. 15, 2017 at UNM’s Smith Plaza. The ball was titled a “Free Speech” ball intended to let people express their free speech rights by writing whatever they please.
Hello gorgeous world was written in massive curly letters on a free speech beach ball in Smith Plaza Wednesday afternoon.
The inflatable beach ball standing taller than some students was brought to Smth Plaza by the UNM chapter of Young Americans for Liberty as a way to remind students of the importance of free speech, and to create dialogues between different-minded groups, according to YAL President Jess Ceron.
We thought it would be a good idea to come out here and talk to them about how we dont support one side of free speech, we support all sides, Ceron said. So anyone and everyone can write whatever they want on this ball. No one is gonna get in trouble for saying it.
Every semester the group does a free speech event, and this is the second time theyve used a beach ball, she said.
This way it makes it fun, rather than if I was to sit here for 30 minutes and say, Let me tell you about free speech. Youd doze off. But with this you can write whatever you want, Ceron said. No ones going to get mad. People arent going to judge you for what you wrote.
Typically student groups holding events outside, in the SUB or in a classroom reserve the space for free, and are asked to do so at least two business days before the event is scheduled to take place so that the space reservation can be approved.
Ceron said YAL intentionally didnt go through that process because they dont believe student organizations should have their free speech limited by space reservations. She said space reservations make holding events difficult because of the time it takes to reserve spaces and wait for a confirmation.
We just dont think that there should be zones where were allowed to do things, especially if were not hurting anyone, she said. And then they could shoot us down, like what if they didnt like the idea of free speech? Thats kind of not fair to students, because
that is our right.
Ceron said she had issues reserving space for a dodgeball event last semester. Student activities would not approve the event because of safety concerns, a reason that Ceron said she understood.
They shot me down for many reasons where I was like, I guess we cant do this event, she said. And I was like, No thats not fair, so I came out and did it without permission. They didnt shoot me down. They didnt say anything.
Ceron said she didnt think events should be denied unless theyve happened before and already been a safety hazard.
YAL has experience with events not coming together, as they originally invited Milo Yiannopoulos to campus, but had to disinvite him and pass the speaker off to the College Republicans, she said.
Milo himself has shown partisanship, and Young Americans for Liberty is not a partisan organization, member Bryan Cusack said. Due to the nature of its tax exemption status it cannot support anyone that supports a candidate.
The group received a lot of messages over initially inviting the controversial Breitbart writer Yiannopoulos they later transferred official hosting duties to UNM College Republicans most of which they didnt respond to, he said.
Most of the criticisms, we just let them go because they were using ad hominem attacks on us, Cusack said. They were using a lot of logical fallacies against us trying to dehumanize the group. Essentially they were playing identity politics.
Ceron said the free speech beach ball was especially important now because the group wants to clarify that everyone can say anything, and they dont have to be nice.
We had a girl who just failed her stats test and she said Forget stats, and wrote it on there, she said.
Officially the group is opposed to hate speech policies, Cusack said.
We just advocate free speech in general, which means the abolishment of hate speech policies, because some of them are written to censor free speech. I could technically say hate speech, but at that point its still free speech, but its just offensive, he said.
The beach ball eventually became adorned with all kinds of messages, some political, some more lighthearted. Just some of the scrawled comments: RIP Harambe, There are only 2 genders and Love each other.
If you really dont want to hear the other side, its totally fine, Ceron said. I just think if you gave your personal opinion on a subject then you should be able to hear it too.
Cathy Cook is a news reporter at the Daily Lobo. She can be reached at email@example.com or on Twitter @Cathy_Daily.
See the article here:
UNM group encourages free speech with huge beach ball – UNM Daily Lobo