Tag Archives: statement

Narendra Modi to unveil 112-ft tall Shiva idol on February 24 – India … – India.com

Posted: February 20, 2017 at 7:01 pm

Chennai, Feb 18:Prime Minister Narendra Modi will unveil a 112-ft tall face of Lord Shiva or Adiyogi at Isha Foundation in Coimbatore on Mahashivaratri, which is on February 24. In a statement Isha Foundation said on Saturday that the face will be largest such on the planet, recognising the first yogis unparalleled contribution to humanity.

This iconic face symbolises liberation, representing the 112 ways in which one can attain the ultimate through the science of yoga, the statement said. According to the Foundation, on Mahasivaratri (February 24) Modi will light the sacred fire to commence the Maha Yoga Yagna across the world when one million people will take oath to teach a simple form of yoga to at least 100 persons in the coming year.

For the first time in the history of humanity, Adiyogi introduced the idea that the simple laws of nature are not permanent restrictions. If one is willing to strive, one can go beyond all limitations and attain liberation, moving humanity from assumed stagnation to conscious evolution, Isha Foundation founder Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev said in the statement.

Describing the significance of Adiyogi, Vasudev said: It is essential that the coming generations on this planet are seekers, not believers. As philosophies, ideology, belief systems that dont stand the test of logic and the scientific verification will naturally collapse in coming decades, you will see the longing for liberation will rise. When that longing rises, Adiyogi and the science of Yoga will become very important.

Mumbai: Man rams car on platform during peak hour, creates chaos at Andheri railway station

Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train: Work for Indias first bullet train route begins; all you need to know about the undersea bullet train corridor

IPL Auction 2017 LIVE Streaming: Watch Online Streaming & Live TV Coverage of IPL Season 10 Auction

IPL Auction 2017 LIVE News Updates: Catch all details of player auction slated to begin at 9 am IST

IPL Auction 2017 LIVE Updates: Pune Supergiants bag Ben Stokes for 14.5 crores

Continue reading here:
Narendra Modi to unveil 112-ft tall Shiva idol on February 24 – India … – India.com

Posted in Conscious Evolution | Comments Off on Narendra Modi to unveil 112-ft tall Shiva idol on February 24 – India … – India.com

Modi to unveil 112-ft tall Shiva idol in Coimbatore on February 24 – Hindustan Times

Posted: February 19, 2017 at 10:59 am

Prime Minister Narendra Modi will unveil a 112-ft tall face of Lord Shiva or Adiyogi at Isha Foundation in Coimbatore on Mahashivaratri, which is on February 24.

In a statement Isha Foundation said on Saturday that the face will be largest such on the planet, recognising the first yogis unparalleled contribution to humanity.

This iconic face symbolises liberation, representing the 112 ways in which one can attain the ultimate through the science of yoga, the statement said.

According to the Foundation, on Mahasivaratri (February 24) Modi will light the sacred fire to commence the Maha Yoga Yagna across the world when one million people will take oath to teach a simple form of yoga to at least 100 persons in the coming year.

For the first time in the history of humanity, Adiyogi introduced the idea that the simple laws of nature are not permanent restrictions. If one is willing to strive, one can go beyond all limitations and attain liberation, moving humanity from assumed stagnation to conscious evolution, Isha Foundation founder Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev said in the statement.

Describing the significance of Adiyogi, Vasudev said: It is essential that the coming generations on this planet are seekers, not believers. As philosophies, ideology, belief systems that dont stand the test of logic and the scientific verification will naturally collapse in coming decades, you will see the longing for liberation will rise. When that longing rises, Adiyogi and the science of Yoga will become very important.

More here:
Modi to unveil 112-ft tall Shiva idol in Coimbatore on February 24 – Hindustan Times

Posted in Conscious Evolution | Comments Off on Modi to unveil 112-ft tall Shiva idol in Coimbatore on February 24 – Hindustan Times

Journalist Cancels Appearance on Real Time Because of Milo – The Libertarian Republic

Posted: February 17, 2017 at 1:47 am

LISTEN TO TLRS LATEST PODCAST:

By Kody Fairfield

A journalist, and frequent guest of Bill Mahers Real Time has cancelled his appearance on the show this Friday night because of Breitbart editor and conservative provocateurMilo Yiannopoulos being chosen as the lead guest, reportsDeadline.

The founder of the Intercept, Jeremy Scahill, has removed himself from the line up of the HBO political talk show in protest of Yiannopoulos saying in a statement released on Twitter that the booking of Milo is many bridges too far.

Deadline reports that Scahill has been a recurring guest on Mahers show over the past decade and that Scahill admits he might not always be popular with its audience.

[Maher]and his staff have created a vital platform for debate and discussion that at times I love and other times loathe, he wrote in the post. I know I fall into the latter category for some of the shows viewers because I hear from them every time I appear. Whatever one might say about Bill, he always allows guests to challenge him or disagree with him.

Scahill in his statement expressed that he believes Milo will incite violence against immigrants, transgender people, and others.

On Friday, a spokesperson for HBO told Deadlinethat Yiannopoulos would appear in the studio with Maher, and that, as with other weeks, an appropriate amount of security will be on hand.

See the article here:

Journalist Cancels Appearance on Real Time Because of Milo – The Libertarian Republic

Posted in Libertarian | Comments Off on Journalist Cancels Appearance on Real Time Because of Milo – The Libertarian Republic

Stephanie Davis deletes her emotional Jeremy McConnell statement slamming him for taking DNA test on live TV – The Sun

Posted: February 12, 2017 at 6:49 am

STEPHANIE Davis appears to have deleted the statement she released on Twitter slamming her ex Jeremy McConnell for taking a DNA test on live TV.

Irish model Jeremy, 26, appeared on This Morning Thursday, where heprovided a swab to find out if hes the father of Stephs newborn baby, Caben-Albi.

OK! Magazine

Ruckas

Shortly after the segment, ex-Hollyoaks star Steph posted a lengthy response, beginning: Stephanie has felt humiliated by Jeremy denying his own son and foolishly announcing publicly his request for a DNA test.

Jeremy has caused Stephanie massive amount of stress, pressure and upset throughout her pregnancy, ruining what for most women is one of the most special times of their lives.

Now the tweet containing the statement has vanished from Stephanies timeline, as well as screen grabs shed posted of tweets by Jeremy denying he was the babys father.

Instagram

Stephanie has felt humiliated by Jeremy denying his own son and foolishly announcing publicly his request for a DNA test.

Jeremy has caused Stephanie massive amount of stress, pressure and upset throughout her pregnancy, ruining what for most women is one of the most special times of their lives.

Jeremy has at no point throughout the pregnancy or after the birth been in contact directly with Stephanie. Jeremy was categorically not banned from the birth, nor did he ever ask to attend.

Stephanie confirmed to Jeremy that she was pregnant 10 days after they split, any suggestion that she was unfaithful to him is to detract away from his numerous infidelities whilst in the relationship.

Jeremy has been given the option at all times to take part in a DNA test, because of past behaviour Stephanie has requested that this is handled via the correct channels and managed by her solicitor.

Jeremy to date has continually refused the terms of the agreement that Stephanie has proposed, which he was given the right to make his own amendments to suit him.

This confidentiality agreement was made to ensure privacy and protect Caben-Albi.

Stephanie as a single mother reserves the right to undertake any work she sees fit to provide for their son, her priority.

It is upsetting to think that Jeremy would stoop so low to challenge the mother of his child to a DNA test live on TV when it was already in hand.This shows how little concern he has for Caben and this is already being dealt with privately.

Caben and Stephanie have only been out of hospital for a few weeks, however after spending 9 months denying that he is the babies father, we cannot believe that Jeremy has the audacity to turn the situation around and bring all of this very much into a media circus, on his terms only.

Twitter

Fans who have been following the saga of Steph and Jeremy who embarked on a tumultuous on-off romance after meeting in the Celebrity Big Brother house last year were quick to notice the statement had been taken down.

A rep for Stephanietold The Sun Online she had no comment regarding the removal of the statement.

Fame Flynet

Meanwhile the new mumappears to be focusing on the positive, tweeting messages of thanks to those who have offered gifts and well wishes forher month-old tot.

A tweet pinned to the top of her timeline reads simply: So very thankful, while her latest Instagram snapshowsa pile of childrens booksnext to Cabens feet,captioned: Ending the day with hugs from this little one. The best feeling in the world.

OK Magazine

Read more here:
Stephanie Davis deletes her emotional Jeremy McConnell statement slamming him for taking DNA test on live TV – The Sun

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Stephanie Davis deletes her emotional Jeremy McConnell statement slamming him for taking DNA test on live TV – The Sun

MeMetics – Your Trusted Online News and How-to Site

Posted: September 20, 2016 at 7:12 pm

Business News Editor September 11, 2016

If you frequently look for jobs online, chances are that you may have applied for one vacancy that

Hello there folks. Safari is generally preinstalled on Mac from the earliest starting point, yet numerous Mac proprietors

You do not need an occasion to celebrate love, but if there is one, there are more reasons

A blast chillers key purpose is to reduce the temperature of the food it contains quickly, with a

They say that information rules the world. This statement particularly resonates with forward-thinking companies who realize the value

Since Apple introduced the iPhone and iPad, other technology companies have taken the same route in making the

We bundle up in the winter months to avoid exposing our skin to chilly temps. Given this, it

If you are considering starting up your own company abroad, there are many options available to you. Each

When it comes to finding some of the best mobile apps, it can be difficult to narrow it

Clinical trials are coming to an end for Indias Quest Life Sciences organisation after marketing approval for an

Follow this link:

MeMetics – Your Trusted Online News and How-to Site

Posted in Memetics | Comments Off on MeMetics – Your Trusted Online News and How-to Site

Filmmakers accuse Robert De Niro of censorship after he …

Posted: May 11, 2016 at 9:41 pm

A controversial film that accuses the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of covering up the link between vaccines and rising autism rates has been pulled from the Tribeca Film Festival after its inclusion sparked outrage andopponents called it intellectually dishonest and propaganda.

A day after he defended the decision to screen the documentary Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe, festival co-founder Robert De Niro announced in a statement Saturday that he reversed course after reviewing the film with colleagues and experts.

My intent in screening this film was to provide an opportunity for conversation around an issue that is deeply personal to me and my family, the statement said. But after reviewing it over the past few days with the Tribeca Film Festival team and others from the scientific community, we do not believe it contributes to or furthers the discussion I had hoped for.

Deadline Hollywood reported that filmmakers have accused Tribeca officials of engaging in censorship.

To our dismay, we learned today about the Tribeca Film Festivals decision to reverse the official selection of Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe,’ director Andrew Wakefield and producer Del Bigtree said.

It is our understanding that persons from an organization affiliated with the festival have made unspecified allegations against the film, the statement continued. We have just witnessed yet another example of the power of corporate interests censoring free speech, art, and truth. Tribecas action will not succeed in denying the world access to the truth behind the film Vaxxed.’

The film is directed and co-written by Wakefield, a polarizing anti-vaccination activist and onetime gastroenterologist whose medical license was revoked by Britains General Medical Council, according to CBS News. Wakefield is also the author of a widely discounted study published in the medical journal the Lancet, in 1998 that was retracted in 2010. Studies from the independent, nonprofit Institute of Medicine, the World Health Organization and the CDC have discredited the notion that a link exists between vaccines and developing autism spectrum disorder, according to the Huffington Post.

The substantial evidence explains why the decision to screen the film drew intense scrutiny from medical experts.

On Friday, De Niro released a statement explaining his decision to screen the film next month, but he noted that he was not personally endorsing the film and is not anti-vaccination.

Grace and I have a child with autism and we believe it is critical that all of the issues surrounding the causes of autism be openly discussed and examined, the statement said. In the 15 years since the Tribeca Film Festival was founded, I have never asked for a film to be screened or gotten involved in the programming.

However this is very personal to me and my family and I want there to be a discussion, which is why we will be screening the film, the statement added.

The statement set off a new round of debate on the festivals Facebook page, with users leaving thousands of heated comments.

Why shouldnt there be discussion around this? one commenter wrote. This is supposed to be a country of free speech.

To say that discussion has not been ongoing before this obvious bit of propaganda is screened is intellectually dishonest, another said. The discussion has been going on for decades and the answer has remained the same. There is no valid science that backs a vaccine-autism link. None.

To say that discussion has not been ongoing before this obvious bit of propaganda is screened is intellectually dishonest

A trailer for the film begins with ominous music and a single question:

Are our children safe?

Read this article:
Filmmakers accuse Robert De Niro of censorship after he …

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Filmmakers accuse Robert De Niro of censorship after he …

Obama speaks out against censorship – Video

Posted: April 12, 2015 at 6:43 am



Obama speaks out against censorship
Obama spoke out against censorship. He will probably have offended some social justice warriors with his statement that people should not self-censor themselves just to prevent people from…

By: Atheist9000

Read the original post:
Obama speaks out against censorship – Video

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Obama speaks out against censorship – Video

SCLC president suspended after comments regarding 2nd Amendment

Posted: April 3, 2015 at 5:47 am

ATLANTA (CBS46) –

The Southern Christian Leadership Conference has suspended Georgia President Rev. Sam Mosteller over comments he made at a news conference on Tuesday.

Mosteller said it’s time for African-Americans to change how they deal with police.

I am going to advocate at this point that all African-Americans advocate their Second Amendment rights, Mosteller said.

The Second Amendment states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Despite his statement about the Second Amendment, Mosteller said he’s not encouraging African-Americans to arm themselves.

I said the Second Amendment right. I didn’t say pack weapons, Mosteller said.

Mosteller said the fatal police shooting of Anthony Hill in DeKalb County and Nick Thomas in Cobb County, both of whom were unarmed, is a wake up call.

“When one is killed senselessly, that one is too many,” Mostellar said. “These killings are reminiscent of the days of old when African-Americans did not have to provoke an officer to become harmed and be endangered species. Black men — no matter the age — are indeed endangered species today, and we must come together with the police community to determine what can be done to stop their violence!”

National SCLC president, Dr. Charles Steele, Jr., issued the following statement. It reads in part:

Visit link:
SCLC president suspended after comments regarding 2nd Amendment

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on SCLC president suspended after comments regarding 2nd Amendment

NATO Secretary General and Prime Minister of Canada – Joint Press Statement, 23 MAR 2015 – Video

Posted: March 26, 2015 at 10:54 am



NATO Secretary General and Prime Minister of Canada – Joint Press Statement, 23 MAR 2015
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper during their bilateral meeting, 23 March 2015. Right Honourable Stephen Harper (Prime Minister of Canada):…

By: NATO

Go here to read the rest:
NATO Secretary General and Prime Minister of Canada – Joint Press Statement, 23 MAR 2015 – Video

Posted in NATO | Comments Off on NATO Secretary General and Prime Minister of Canada – Joint Press Statement, 23 MAR 2015 – Video

ASHG and ESHG issue position statement on non-invasive prenatal screening

Posted: March 25, 2015 at 2:45 pm

BETHESDA, MD, USA and VIENNA, AUSTRIA – Two of the world’s largest professional societies of human geneticists have issued a joint position statement on the promise and challenges of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), a new procedure to test blood drawn from pregnant mothers for Down syndrome and other chromosomal disorders in the fetus. The document addresses the current scope of and likely future improvements in NIPT technology, ways it may best fit with existing prenatal screening tools and protocols, options and priorities in its implementation, and associated social and ethical issues.

The statement, drafted by the Social Issues Committee of the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) and the Public and Professional Policy Committee of the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG), was published online March 18 in the European Journal of Human Genetics.

Current prenatal screening protocols for common structural abnormalities in the chromosomes vary among countries and medical practices. Generally, though, pregnant women are offered a combined first-trimester screening (cFTS), a risk assessment test based on blood and ultrasound markers. Women who receive abnormal cFTS results undergo a second step of testing to confirm or deny whether the fetus has an abnormality such as Down syndrome. This second step involves invasive procedures, such as amniocentesis, that in 0.5-1% of cases may lead to a miscarriage.

One important drawback of cFTS is the high rate of false alarms that lead to invasive procedures that put pregnancies at risk when the fetus is actually chromosomally normal. The main benefit of NIPT, apart from a significantly higher detection rate, is that it dramatically lowers the false alarm rate from about 5% to about 0.2%, making prenatal screening more accurate and safe. This is achieved by analyzing fragments of DNA in maternal blood, some of which provides information about the fetus. The fact that this ‘fetal DNA’ actually derives from the placenta is one reason why NIPT is not fully reliable. An important implication of this is that women who receive an abnormal NIPT result should still be advised to confirm this result through a second step of testing if they are considering a termination of pregnancy, the statement authors write.

The authors explored the benefits and drawbacks of various ways to implement NIPT, such as adding it to the current two-step process or using it to replace cFTS. As NIPT is significantly more expensive, the cost per test would need to be reduced considerably for the latter option to be feasible in fully funded prenatal screening programs, they noted. They also considered implications of the technology, including pressures on women to undergo the test and act upon the results, and the loss of ultrasound data that would indicate fetal problems if that step is removed from the screening process.

“Throughout our discussion, we kept in mind that the goal of prenatal screening is to enable autonomous, informed reproductive choices by pregnant women and their partners, not to prevent the birth of children with specific abnormalities,” said Yvonne Bombard, PhD, 2014 chair of the ASHG Social Issues Committee.

The two committees also addressed emerging advances in NIPT technology that would allow testing for additional genetic conditions, such as rare microdeletion syndromes and syndromes that interfere with sexual development. They noted that as NIPT grows to include more conditions – producing results of varying certainty – pre-test genetic counseling will become significantly more complex.

“Although there is no convincing ethical reason to limit NIPT to Down syndrome and a few other chromosomal abnormalities, we are concerned about prematurely expanding NIPT to include rare conditions for which the test may not be sufficiently validated, or of which the clinical implications may not be fully understood. For example, parents-to-be will have to make difficult choices about how to act upon abnormal results for such conditions,” said Wybo Dondorp, PhD, first author of the statement.

“A related concern about prematurely expanding the scope of the test is that it will reverse the significant decrease in false alarms and subsequent need for follow-up diagnostic procedures, which has been regarded as the main gain of NIPT in prenatal screening”, said Diana Bianchi, MD, a member of the ASHG Social Issues Committee and co-author on the statement.

The statement authors also considered the longer-term question of how extensive prenatal genetic screening should be, and emphasized the role of infrastructure in enabling responsible use of NIPT. Priorities included educating health professionals and the public about its benefits and limitations, promoting equal access despite cost issues, controlling the quality of pre-test counseling and laboratory practices, and systematically evaluating the whole process. In all, the two committees published ten recommendations for the broader implementation of NIPT, including suggested next steps.

Link:
ASHG and ESHG issue position statement on non-invasive prenatal screening

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on ASHG and ESHG issue position statement on non-invasive prenatal screening